Quantum Approximation Methods¶
Variational Method¶
Trial functions¶
Some of the calculable trial functions:
- ψ(x)=cosαx, for |αx|<π/2, otherwise 0.
- ψ(x)=α2−x2, for |x|<α, otherwise 0.
- ψ(x)=Cexp(−αx2/2).
- ψ(x)=C(α−|x|), for |x|<α, otherwise 0.
- ψ(x)=Csinαx, for |αx|<π, otherwise 0.
Procedure¶
Pick a trial function.
Note
How to pick a trial function? For ground state energy, we should pick a function that has the same property as the real ground state. This requires some understanding of the problem we are dealing with.
Things to consider:
- The new problem is just a modification of a known solved problem. Then we can easily find out what really is different and interprete the new problem in terms of the old one.
- If the Hamiltonian have definite parity, the ground state wave function should pick up some parity which is usually even to make it the lowest energy.
- Continious function? A C∞ Hamiltonian can only have continious functions as solutions for a finite system.
- Nodes deteremines the kinetic energy so check the nodes for ground state wave function.
- Check the behivior of the wave function at different limits. In most cases, the Shrödinger equation can be reduced to something solvable at some limits.
- One more thing, the trial function should make the problem calculable.
Why Not General Viriational Method¶
Why don’t we just use a most general variational method to find out the ground state? Because we will eventually come back to the time-independent Shrödinger equation.
Suppose we have a functional form
The reason we have this Lagrange multiplier method is that the wave function should be normalized and this multiplier provides the degree of freedom. We would only get a wrong result if we don’t include this DoF.
Variation of ψ∗,
Now what?
Not helpful.
Variational Method and Virial Theorem¶
For a potential V(x)=bxn, we can prove that virial theorem is valid for ground state if we use Gaussian trial function e−αx2/2.
A MMA proof is here.
Virial theorem is pretty interesting. It shares the same math with equipartition theorem.
WKB¶
This is a semi-classical method. It is semi classical because we will use the classical momentum
The following points are important for this method.
WKB start from a classical estimation of wave number at a certain energy E which is later quantified by the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule.
Conservation law:
∂∂tρ+∇⋅→j=0where ρ=ψ∗ψ, →j=−ℏ2mi(ψ∇ψ∗−ψ∗∇ψ). This can be derived from Shrödinger equation easily.
Phase: Wave function is generally A(x)exp(ϕ(x)). However, ϕ(x) should be the area of the phase function starting from some initial point. For example in WKB, k(x)=ϕ′(x) and ϕ(x)=∫ϕ′(x′)dx′=∫k(x′)dx′.
Using this general wave function and conservation law we find out that A(x) 1√k(x). Then we can apply the two boundary conditions. However we will find two different wave functions given by two boundary conditions. Now we should connect them because ψ(a)=ψ(b) exactly. By comparing the two wave functions we can find something like Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule.
Correction at bouldary: However, this method requires that the potential varies slowly or equivalently the wave number varies slowly. Basicly we are just using the following approximation:
A′(x)=0,k′(x)=0For example when taking the derivative of wave function,
ψ′(x)=A′(x)ei∫⋯+A(x)k(x)ei∫⋯≈A(x)k(x)ei∫⋯where we drop the term with A′(x). That is to say
|A′|≪|Ak|⇒|k′|≪k2But at boundary where E=V, this is obviously not valid because k=0. So we need to fix this problem.
The solution is to use first order of the potential in a Taylor expansion. Then solve the problem exactly. Finally we connect regions that is far out from the boundary, need the boundary and between the boundary.
If we can have a good boundary condition, then the energy spectrum given by WKB can be very good. Even we don’t have a good boundary condtion, the excited states given by this method are always close to the exact ones.